This is close to what I envisioned

https://www.facebook.com/neofect/videos/474889796364392/

https://home.neofect.com/blog/portable-home-therapies-for-stroke-rehab-anywhere

What I have been Doing these Past 3 Years!!

Time is running away with me....this was a some time ago, and our project even longer!



If I am successful I can fund my own experiments, publish them, and take the project from there. I haven't forgotten the Music and Neurology project at all!

LATE UPDATE BUT IMPORTANT

Gentlemen,

If you peruse through the articles on the webpages below you will see that the work we did is still spot-on track, and on the cutting edge.

Music therapy today is, as I said, superficial and nostalgia based. What I have been proposing takes the cyclic characteristics of musical stimulus into the deeper parts of the brain- where they are already KNOWN to have real effects. It is my intimate knowledge of the Internalized Musical Cyclical Forms (IMCFs), my knowledge of semiotics, and my research into neurology, that has afforded me the insights I've arrived at.

What you will note below is that DBS (Deep Brain Stimulus) is an invasive surgical approach to achieve the very same goals that I suggested can be obtained through a new kind of musical therapy based upon the guided use of the IMCF. Pulsations, or cycles, are the key.

It is also possible that the DBS approach combined with my IMCF approach could work together.

Either way- the first step is to conduct the experiments that I proposed in my summary. I was going to use the 10K seed money to purchase a portable EEG system that interfaces with a computer. But I found that I had to be a licensed neurologist to even buy one. Finding a practicing biofeedback neurologist to partner with also proved problematic due to the fact that they all are were struggling to make ends meet themselves.

Nonetheless as this article reveals, the Brain Machine Interface field is also advancing:

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK3890/

I am right at the cusp of both advancing fields: DBS and BMI. I can provide a key element in the puzzle that both fields are working on.

Below are relevant information on DBS:


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deep_brain_stimulation

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a neurosurgical procedure involving the implantation of a medical device called a brain pacemaker, which sends electrical impulses, through implanted electrodes, to specific parts of the brain (brain nucleus) for the treatment of movement and affective disorders. DBS in select brain regions has provided therapeutic benefits for otherwise-treatment-resistant movement and affective disorders such as Parkinson's disease, essential tremor, dystonia, chronic pain, major depression and OCD.^[1] Despite the long history of DBS,^[2] its underlying principles and mechanisms are still not clear.^[3][4] DBS directly changes brain activity in a controlled manner, its effects are reversible (unlike those of lesioning techniques), and it is one of only a few neurosurgical methods that allow blinded studies.^{[citation needed]}

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved DBS as a treatment for essential tremor in 1997,^{[citation needed]} for Parkinson's disease in 2002,^[5] dystonia in 2003,^[6] and obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) in 2009.^[7] DBS is also used in research studies to treat chronic pain and has been used to treat various affective disorders, including major depression; neither of these applications of DBS have yet been FDA-approved. While DBS has proven helpful for some patients, there is potential for serious complications and side effects.

http://www.hindawi.com/journals/pd/2010/189371/

Case Report

Placement of the Internal Pulse Generator for Deep Brain Stimulation in the Upper Back to Prevent Fracture of the Extension Wire Due to Generator Rotation: Case Report

Ankur Garg, Avinash L. Mohan, and P. Charles Garell

Department of Neurosurgery, New York Medical College, Valhalla, NY 10595, USA

Received 14 June 2009; Revised 11 October 2009; Accepted 8 December 2009

Academic Editor: Francisco Grandas

Copyright © 2010 Ankur Garg et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

http://neurosurgery.ucsf.edu/index.php/movement_disorders_parkinsons.html

FAQ for Patients: Deep Brain Stimulation for Parkinson's Disease

Neurosurgeons: Philip A. Starr MD, PhD; Paul S. Larson MD
Neurologists: Jill Ostrem MD; Alec Glass MD; William J. Marks, Jr. MD
Nurses: Monica Volz RN; Robin Taylor RN; Susan Heath RN
Research Coordinator: Jamie Grace

When should one consider surgical therapy?

As you can see: pulse, is just another word for cycle. Stimulating the deep brain with controlled frequencies and vibrations is the key. The IMCF allows the patient to actually participate in this process rather than remain a passive recipient of static applications. Knowledge of IMCFs could also guide the pulsing stimulus of the DBS technique so that the pulses are not just linear, but cyclical- that is, the pulses themselves would be linked to longer(slower), and shorter (faster) pulsations: cycles within cycles.This is a "musical" component that so far has been lost on the practitioners within both fields.

This looks like it could use the IMCF for a visceral interaction between abstarct cue and biological response...

Memento Book for the Project Participants

The Music and Science Project by W. Gerard Poole | Make Your Own Book

Hello everyone,

I'll be sending copies out. Thank you all so much again for your support and participation in this project. Now it's up to me to take it to the next step.

Small Business Grants

Hello Everyone,

Just an update:

I'm currently applying for a Small Business Grant, in conjunction with my Father's company El Poco Inc., for conducting the three experiments I outlined in the project summary. I'm hoping for the best. I am increasingly convinced that with the latest developments in Bionics and Neurology, the therapeutic approach outlined in the summary of our project is going to be the future for music therapy  (or strategic sound engineering entrainement).

With these new strategies we can hopefully facilitate a faster adaptation, on the part of the patient, to the bionic limb. This is something that I have not even found a precedence for but that I am convinced will be an extremely useful tool, especially for the wounded veterans. This project, after all, in keeping with Dr. Anand's vision, was to make a contribution to the many wounded warrior programs.

Project Summary

[Well gentlemen (and Ms Ania, of course), this wonderful project is finally coming to a close and I thank you all so much for your support. I am in the process of producing a booklet for everyone involved. The booklet will contain printed pages of the Blog posts, photos, and all the produced materials. Included on the back covers will be an attached CD that will have the final summary (shown below) and both of the Power Points. I hope you enjoy them, they should be ready within three weeks. Again, thank you all so much, and especially Dr. Anand.]

A Preliminary Study Toward a New Approach to the Neurology of Music for Therapeutic Purposes

By

W. Gerard Poole, Ph.D.

For the

Center for Energetic Concepts Development

Dr. Davinder Anand, Director

and

 Dr. Michael G. Pecht

Director of CALCE Center for Life Cycle Engineering

In Conjunction with the

Association for the Exploration of Music, Culture, and Science

And in consultation with

William Taft Stuart, Ph.D.

Professor of Anthropology, UMD at College Park

This preliminary investigation is about Music Therapy and Brain Plasticity. It asks a basic question: Can there be a real, significant, fruitful relationship between the two? This preliminary survey of the field suggests strongly that there could be, and that the relationship between the two might potentially revolutionize the field of music therapy. This survey also strongly suggests that the fields of Ethnomusicology and Ritual Studies can introduce compelling insights that will be useful to the field of music therapy and to the phenomenon of brain plasticity.

The report involves three general subjects; (1) relevant developments within the fields of brain research (brain plasticity),(2) observations and analysis of specific music therapy applications, and (3) relevant theories of music and evolution that suggest a new approach that the field of music therapy might take.

Firstly, the paper discusses the general observation that the most important group of facts to emerge over the last decade in regards to brain research and music and neurology has to do with the concept of brain plasticity. Two critical facts have emerged: first, that the brain is capable of restructuring itself, and secondly, that this process continues throughout the life of an individual (although it does diminish to some extent past late childhood).

Secondly, this report covers some of the major emergent facts that are relevant to the relationship between music and brain plasticity. Two of the most important are: (1) that musical processes (applied sound structures) can stimulate brain plasticity (generating new cells) and (2) that music can also stimulate the innate powers of the brain to restructure itself (increase connections between existing cells). Furthermore, music practice can increase brain volume, predominantly within the corpus colossus (that part of the midbrain through which the left and right hemispheres coordinate with each other). These emergent facts have been shown to be virtually conclusive though clinical studies that span roughly from the mid-nineties to the present. Nonetheless the facts are subject to interpretation as this report reveals.

A brief summary of specific theoretical models that link music, the emotional spectrum, and evolution, are considered in order to provide a foundational theory for how current music therapies might be reformulated toward new direction. The chief authors considered are; Nils Wallin (music, the emotional spectrum, brain capacity, and human consciousness); Antonio Damasio (the neurology of the emotions and consciousness); Steven Mithen (music, the corpus colossus brain mass, and cross-modular thinking processes); Steven Levitin (the neurology of music and human social evolution); Robert Jourdain (music and ecstasy) Robert Zatorre, and Isabel Peretz (neurology of music, and cognition), J. Sloboda et al, (music and emotion); and W. Gerard Poole (the Internalized Musical Form; relationships between musical form, emotional mode, and ritual proliferation; music and ritual in relation to the ecstatic experience).

It is proposed, based on the work of the above authors, that proto-musical, and proto-ritual behaviors played critical roles in the evolution of brain mass (new cell growth), brain capacity (more complex interconnections between cells), and brain cross-modular processing (more complex interactions between different parts of the brain), among late-hominids and early humans. The aim of a music therapy then is to utilize innate fundamental relationships between structured musical behaviors, the generation of structured sounds, and the resultant neurological processes, to stimulate neurological changes within the brain and the central nervous system.  In a sense then, the proposed therapy would stimulate the neurological processes of the brain’s own evolutionary path. The difference being that rather than stimulating the brain toward generating new capacities, the brain would be stimulated to regenerate capacities it already possessed.

Critical to the issue of stimulating brain plasticity are relationships between music, the emotions, endorphins, dopamine, the issue of inhibition and dormancy versus cell awakening, etc. The fact that music (or structured sound) can stimulate plasticity through stem cell growth is the immediate issue. However, music can also suppress brain activity, which is also critical.

 Examples of current nostalgic, or mood enhancement music therapy, as well as emotion and memory based therapies are examined. These techniques tend to rely primarily on the referential aspects of music, those qualities that it shares with language. However, this study finds that changes from one state of mind, or one emotional state to another, by using music to stimulate references, can only facilitate other therapeutic techniques, and while it is also acknowledged that the link between emotions and memory can be useful in the course of a therapy, in the long run these kinds of music therapies cannot repair brain damage or even effectively treat lesser ailments.

A central theoretical issue addressed by this paper is the proposition that there is a basic misunderstanding of what is occurring within the Broca area of the brain when processing music and language. It is proposed that music harmony has nothing to do with linguistic syntax. This issue represents a fundamental misunderstanding about the nature of musical processes that is still prevalent among music therapists and music neurologists.

Three experiments are proposed that would contribute toward a concrete delineation between nostalgic, or referential musical practices that characterize the current state of music therapy, and a new applied structured music therapy that could potentially work directly on the brain: music structure, performance structure, brain structure